#Maxqda vs qsr nvivo full

I like the ability to tag subsections of documents, and/or to treat multiple documents as a larger “virtual” document and a large document as a collection of smaller “virtual” documents. Certain features would, I believe, be helpful to a large subset of the userbase and may constitute a useful “path” for DEVONthink to explore as it adds some amount of QDA functionality. I don’t want to give anyone any false impressions I think marketing DT for qualitative analysis would open up a whole new market for you making it worth the effort.Įn./wiki/Computer_A … s_Softwareįirst of all, let me note that while I’m employed with DEVONtechnologies, that nothing I say here should be interpreted as a statement of intent. (There are very few programs that run on Macs without Windows emulation.) Please consider supporting this use in your development cycle. They’re difficult to use and not very flexible. I’ve used DTP for years and I would love to use it instead of one of the expensive qualitative data analysis programs or one of the more clunky open source versions. It’s frustrating how close DT comes to being useful for qualitative research. Please don’t assume that lack of users begging for it means there’s no market. I noticed that on one thread the response was that you hadn’t received any requests for it lately so it wasn’t being considered as a development goal. I was perusing the previous threads about using DT for qualitative research.

#Maxqda vs qsr nvivo full

I’ve stuffed a single DB full of PDFs both big and small along with my own RTF notes and I’ve really appreciated its seemingly unlimited capacity and general zippiness. I love DTP and have found it invaluable to manage my doctoral research over the past several years.